Serious child safeguarding cases are those in which:
Serious harm includes (but is not limited to) serious and/or long-term impairment of a child's mental health or intellectual, emotional, social or behavioural development. It should also cover impairment of physical health. This is not an exhaustive list. When making decisions, judgment should be exercised in cases where the impairment is likely to be long-term, even if this is not immediately certain.
Where a local authority in England knows or suspects that a child has been abused or neglected, the local authority must notify the Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel (the Panel) if –
16C(1) of the Children Act 2004
(as amended by the Children and Social Work Act 2017)
The local authority must notify the Panel of any event that meets the criteria within 5 working days of becoming aware that the incident has occurred. The local authority should also report the event to the safeguarding partners in their area (and in other areas if appropriate) within 5 working days. Where the child was Looked After, the local authority must also notify the Secretary of State and Ofsted that they have died, regardless of whether abuse or neglect is known or suspected.
The duty to notify serious child safeguarding events to the Panel rests with the local authority. Information on the process to be followed using the Child Incident Notification System can be found on GOV.UK.
Safeguarding partners must make arrangements to:
Others agencies working with children should inform the safeguarding partners of any incident which they think should be considered for a child safeguarding practice review.
The safeguarding partners should promptly undertake a rapid review of any case which meets the criteria for a serious child safeguarding incident (see Section 2, Notifications of Serious Child Safeguarding Events), in line with any guidance published by the Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel. This should be completed within 15 days of the safeguarding partners becoming aware of the incident. The aim of this rapid review is to enable safeguarding partners to:
The brief overview report from local agencies should determine the level of their involvement with the child and the family (if any) and provide an overview of any key significant events and the dates of their involvement. Agencies should also report on any areas of inter agency practice that may highlight future learning either because it worked well or because it caused concern. Agencies should also secure any relevant record/files in a secure place and keep a copy of the report they submitted to the rapid review as they may be required to provide more detailed information if a national or a local safeguarding practice review is subsequently commissioned.
A rapid review into all serious child safeguarding cases has to be completed within 15 working days of safeguarding partners becoming aware of the incident. As soon as the rapid review is complete, the safeguarding partners should send a copy to the Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel (The Panel may share this with DfE if requested, to enable DfE to carry out its functions).
They should also share with the Panel their decision about whether a local child safeguarding practice review is appropriate, or whether they think the case may raise issues which are complex or of national importance such that a national review may be appropriate.
They may also do this at a later stage if, during the course of a local child safeguarding practice review, new information comes to light which suggests that a national review may be appropriate.
The Panel will aim to respond promptly with a decision on the majority of cases within 15 working days of a rapid review being received.
When a serious incident becomes known to the safeguarding partners, they must consider whether the case meets the criteria for a local review. Meeting the criteria does not mean that safeguarding partners must automatically carry out a local child safeguarding practice review. It is for partners to determine whether a review is appropriate, taking into account that the overall purpose of a review is to identify improvements to practice.
Issues might appear to be the same in some child safeguarding cases but reasons for actions and behaviours may vary resulting in different learning to be gained from similar cases. Decisions on whether to undertake reviews should be made transparently and the rationale communicated appropriately, including to families.
The criteria which the local safeguarding partners must take into account when determining whether to carry out a local child safeguarding practice review includes whether the case highlights or may highlight:
Safeguarding partners should also have regard to the following circumstances:
Some cases may not meet the definition of a 'serious child safeguarding case' but the safeguarding partners may choose to undertake a local child safeguarding practice review because they raise issues of importance to the local area, for example good practice, poor practice or where there have been 'near miss' events.
As soon as safeguarding partners have determined that a local review will be carried out, they should inform the Panel, Ofsted and DfE, including the name of any reviewer they have commissioned.
On receipt of the information from the rapid review, the Panel must decide whether it is appropriate to commission a national review of a case or cases. In doing so they must consider the criteria and guidance below.
The criteria which the Panel must take into account include whether the case:
The Panel should also have regard to the following circumstances:
The Panel should inform the relevant safeguarding partners promptly following receipt of the rapid review, if they consider that:
When making decisions on whether to undertake national reviews, the Panel should communicate their rationale appropriately, including to families. If the Panel decides to undertake a national review they should discuss with the relevant safeguarding partners the potential scope and methodology of the review and how they will engage with them and those involved in the case. The Panel will also notify the Secretary of State.
There will be instances where a local review has been carried out which could then form part of a thematic review that the Panel undertakes at a later date. There may also be instances when a local review has not been carried out but where the Panel considers that the case could be helpful to a national review at some stage in the future. In such circumstances, the Panel should engage with safeguarding partners to agree the conduct of the review.
Alongside any national or local reviews, there could be a criminal investigation, a coroner's investigation and/or professional body disciplinary procedures. The Panel and the safeguarding partners should have clear processes for how they will work with other investigations, including Domestic Homicide Reviews, multi-agency public protection arrangements (MAPPA) reviews or Safeguarding Adults Reviews, and work collaboratively with those responsible for carrying out those reviews.
This is important to reduce burdens on and anxiety for the children and families concerned and to minimise duplication of effort and uncertainty.
The Panel must set up a pool of potential reviewers who can undertake national reviews, a list of whom must be publicly available. If they consider that there are no potential reviewers in the pool with availability or suitable experience to undertake the review, they may select a person who is not in the pool. When selecting a reviewer, the Panel should consider whether they have any conflict of interest, which could restrict their ability, or perceived ability, to identify improvements impartially. If the Panel determines that a reviewer they appointed should be removed from a review prior to the report or information relating to improvements being published, the Secretary of State must remove the reviewer from the review.
For national child safeguarding practice reviews, the Panel should follow the same guidance on procedure and supervision as for local child safeguarding practice reviews set out in the following section.
The safeguarding partners are responsible for commissioning and supervising reviewers for local reviews.
In all cases they should consider whether the reviewer has the following:
Safeguarding partners may also consider appointing reviewers from the Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel's pool of reviewers where available. The safeguarding partners may remove a reviewer from a review at any time prior to the report of the review, or information relating to improvements, being published.
The safeguarding partners should agree with the reviewer(s) the method by which the review should be conducted, taking into account this guidance and the principles of the systems methodology recommended by the Munro review. The methodology should provide a way of looking at and analysing frontline practice as well as organisational structures and learning. The methodology selected should be able to draw out recommendations that will improve outcomes for children. All reviews should reflect the child's perspective and the family context.
The review should be proportionate to the circumstances of the case, focus on potential learning, and establish and explain the reasons why the events occurred as they did.
The safeguarding partners must supervise the review to ensure that the reviewer is making satisfactory progress and that the review is of satisfactory quality.
The safeguarding partners may request information from the reviewer during the review to enable them to assess progress and quality; any such requests must be made in writing. The President's guidance: Judicial Cooperation with Serious Case Reviews should also be noted in the context of child safeguarding practice reviews.
Safeguarding partners must ensure that the final report includes:
Any recommendations should be clear on what is required of relevant agencies and others collectively and individually, and by when, and focus on improving outcomes for children.
Reviews should promote and share information about improvements, both within the area and potentially beyond, and safeguarding partners must publish the report, unless they consider it inappropriate to do so. In such a circumstance, they must publish any information about the improvements that should be made following the review as they consider appropriate. The name of the reviewer(s) should be included. Published reports or information must be publicly available for at least one year.
When compiling and preparing to publish the report, the safeguarding partners should consider carefully how best to manage the impact of the publication on children, family members, practitioners and others closely affected by the case. The safeguarding partners should ensure that reports are written in such a way so that what is published avoids harming the welfare of any children or vulnerable adults involved in the case.
Safeguarding partners must send a copy of the full report to the Panel and to the Secretary of State no later than 7 working days before the date of publication. Where the safeguarding partners decide only to publish information relating to the improvements to be made following the review, they must also provide a copy of that information to the Panel and the Secretary of State within the same timescale. They should also provide the report, or information about improvements, to Ofsted within the same timescale.
Depending on the nature and complexity of the case, the report should be completed and published as soon as possible and no later than 6 months from the date of the decision to initiate a review.
Where other proceedings may have an impact on or delay publication, for example an ongoing criminal investigation, inquest or future prosecution, the safeguarding partners should inform the Panel and the Secretary of State of the reasons for the delay. Safeguarding partners should also set out for the Panel and the Secretary of State the justification for any decision not to publish either the full report or information relating to improvements. Safeguarding partners should have regard to any comments that the Panel or the Secretary of State may make in respect of publication.
Every effort should also be made, both before the review and while it is in progress to:
The Panel must ensure that the final report includes:
The Panel must publish the report, unless they consider it inappropriate to do so. In such a circumstance they must publish any information about the improvements that should be made following the review as they consider appropriate. The name of the reviewer(s) should be included.
The Panel should work with safeguarding partners to identify and manage the impact of the publication on children, family members, practitioners and others closely affected by the case.
The Panel must ensure that reports or information published are publicly available for at least 3 years. The Panel must send a copy of the full report to the Secretary of State no later than 7working days before the date of publication. Where the Panel decides only to publish information relating to the improvements to be made following the review, they must also provide a copy of that information to the Secretary of State within the same timescale. The Panel should also send a copy of the report or improvements to the relevant safeguarding partners, Ofsted, the Care Quality Commission and Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services.
Reports should be completed and published within 6months of the date of the decision to initiate a review. Where other proceedings may have an impact on or delay publication, for example an ongoing criminal investigation, inquest or future prosecution, the Panel should advise the Secretary of State of the reasons for the delay. The Panel should also set out for the Secretary of State the explanation for any decision not to publish either the full report or information relating to improvements. During the review, the Panel should share any points that arise about improvements needed with the safeguarding partners in any local authority areas covered by the review and others as applicable.
The Panel should send copies of published reports of national and local child safeguarding practice reviews, or published information relating to improvements that should be made following those reviews, to the What Works Centre for Children's Social Care and relevant inspectorates, bodies or individuals as they see fit. Where a local review results in findings which are of national importance, or in recommendations for national government, the Panel should consider the potential of those recommendations to improve systems to safeguard and promote the welfare of children and how best to disseminate and embed such learning.
The safeguarding partners should take account of the findings from their own local reviews and from all national reviews, with a view to considering how identified improvements should be implemented locally, including the way in which organisations and agencies work together to safeguard and promote the welfare of children.
The safeguarding partners should highlight findings from reviews with relevant parties locally and should regularly audit progress on the implementation of recommended improvements. Improvement should be sustained through regular monitoring and follow up of actions so that the findings from these reviews make a real impact on improving outcomes for children.
Only valid for 48hrs