 | Copyright © tri.x | |
The Children’s Views, Wishes and Feelings Standard
Regulation 7
Family Time/Contact with Parents/Carers, Siblings and Others Procedure
NSPCC Report Remove Tool - The tool enables young people under the age of 18 to report a nude image or video of themselves which has appeared online. The Internet Watch Foundation will review these reports and work to remove any content which breaks the law.
UK Council for Internet Safety (UKCIS) Digital Passport - a communication tool to support children and young people with care experience to talk with their carers about their online lives.
Leeds Safeguarding Children Partnership – E-Safety Guidance and Strategy for Practitioners
Online Safety Talking to Your Child About Online Sexual Harassment (Children’s Commissioner)
Childnet Parents and Carers Toolkit
In August 2022, a link to the Children’s Commissioner guide about Talking to Your Child About Online Sexual Harassment was added. A link to Childnet Parents and Carers Toolkit was also added.
It will be in the interests of the majority of Children Looked After to maintain contact with their family and friends. Staff in the home should support and encourage children and young people to maintain family contacts and develop new friendships. However, any arrangements for Family Time and any contact details (telephone numbers etc.) must be included in the Placement Plan agreed between the home and the child’s placing authority. The Placement Plan should be reviewed as part of the 6 monthly Child Looked After Review to ensure relevant contact information remains correct.
Any issues relating to contact which arise in between reviews should be addressed accordingly. Residential staff need to be aware of both the risks and opportunities associated with children’s use of social networking sites and apps. However, this must be viewed within the context of the overall plan for the child or young person and, in particular, any specific contact arrangements that are in place or to be reviewed.
Social networking sites and apps may sometimes appear to threaten carefully designed contact arrangements. For example, a child’s Care Plan may state that they are to have no contact with particular members of their family or there could be a No Contact Order in place from the court. Residential staff and social workers must be clear with children and young people in care about the possibility of being contacted by ‘unsafe’ people through social networking sites and apps or in any other way. The social worker must discuss this potential situation with the young person when looking at any contact arrangements that have been made as part of the Care Plan.
Appropriate forms of contact should be promoted and facilitated for each child, including visits to the child in the home; Family Time with relatives and/or friends; sending and receiving letters, emails and texts; use of social media and other forms of contact via the internet.
There may be circumstances where Residential Practitioners assess that restriction of contact is necessary to safeguard the child. Such decisions should not be taken lightly and must be agreed with the placing authority, where possible, except in an emergency situation, where the placing authority must be notified within 24 hours.Children’s homes have a duty to provide access to a telephone that children can use privately. This can include the provision of a mobile phone where appropriate and safe for the child, as long as an alternative is in place for the child to make telephone calls in private if their personal mobile phone is lost, out of credit or broken.
In the ITM homes, we would liaise with the young person’s care giver in regards to their ability to access internet and how they would like this to be managed- this is to ensure that we have a consistent and sustainable plan for when they return to the identified care giver.
As part of the placement process, the Registered Children’s Homes Manager and the child’s placing authority should agree the arrangements for contact by letter / email, telephone / mobile phone, the internet and social media. The Placement Plan should be reviewed as and when required and as part of the 6 monthly Child Looked After Review.
If any risks are identified, these must be addressed in the Placement Plan, including any restrictions on contact considered necessary to safeguard the child and promote their welfare. If restrictions are imposed, the arrangements should be regularly reviewed and the arrangements changed if the risks reduce.
If a child is placed in an emergency, the Emergency Review should consider the arrangements for contact by letter, telephone / mobile, the internet and social media.
Children will have access to telephones (including mobiles), computers / laptops and tablets at reasonable times, in line with what would be considered acceptable for their peers who are not looked after. The child’s Placement Plan should cover delegated authority in relation to the use of social media.
At any time, if staff consider that a child or others may be at risk from having access to telephones, mobiles, computers/the internet or other forms of communication, they must take steps to reduce or prevent the risk. The risk evidenced should be clearly recorded within the young person’s current risk assessment along with the preventative methods to help reduce the risk and should be communicated to the named relevant professionals.
If the risk is of Significant Harm (including online or cyberbullying), serious damage to property or of a criminal offence being committed, staff must consider withdrawal/confiscation. Preferably, withdrawal should be by agreement with the child; if agreement is not forthcoming, the Registered Children’s Homes Manager should apply the same principles as set out for searching a child without consent, in Searching Children/Bedrooms Procedure.
If any such restrictions are imposed, the Registered Children’s Homes Manager and child’s social worker must be notified within 24 hours and consideration must be given to whether any ongoing restrictions should be imposed upon the child; any arrangements for ongoing restrictions must be outlined in the child’s Placement Plan.
If a child is prevented from having access to a telephone, or access is reduced, it is deemed to be a Sanction, and must be recorded as such. Such a ‘sanction’ would not be appropriate when caring for young people with complex needs who could not understand the reasons for withholding access in this way.As set out above, mobiles or other devices may be seized by staff if it can be shown that the mobile/device is being used, or may be used, to place the child or others (including staff) at risk of Significant Harm; this could include from their use of internet or social networking sites and the exchange of images/video clips (so called sexting) or posting of them on such sites e.g. as a form or cyber/online bullying.
If items are seized, they must be passed to the Registered Children’s Homes Manager, who must record the seizure and come to a decision about whether to confiscate the device, where appropriate to do so.
Confiscation is reasonable where the Registered Children’s Homes Manager considers that the device will be used in a manner which will place the child or others at continuing risk of Significant Harm, in order to cause serious damage to property or if there is a suspicion that the device is not owned by the child e.g. stolen. In such circumstances, the Registered Children’s Homes Manager should pass the device to the Police or keep it safely in the home.
If the device is owned by/the property of the child, the Registered Children’s Homes Manager may retain it until satisfied that it will be used reasonably i.e. in a way that does not place the child or others at risk.
If retained, the Registered Children’s Homes Manager should provide the child with a receipt.The internet is an integral part of our lives, and children living in Children’s Homes need to learn how to use the internet safely and take responsibility for their own safety. This is best achieved by providing guidance in the home environment.
“Children and young people need to be empowered to keep themselves safe – this isn’t just about a top-down approach. Children will be children – pushing boundaries and taking risks. At a public swimming pool we have gates, put up signs, have lifeguards and shallow ends, but we also teach children how to swim…
… just like in the offline world, no amount of effort to reduce potential risks to children will eliminate those risks completely. We cannot make the Internet completely safe. Because of this, we must also build children’s resilience to the material to which they may be exposed so that they have the confidence and skills to navigate these new media waters more safely”.
Safer Children in a Digital World - Report of the Byron Review Executive Summary, March 2008.
Children and young people should be supported by staff in the home to use the internet and social media safety, including to understand that when they use digital technology they should not give out personal information, particularly their name, address or school, mobile phone numbers to anyone they do not know or trust. Discussions should also cover safeguards young people must consider if they plan to meet someone face to face whom they have only previously met online.
The development of home internet rules can help in setting clear boundaries, using appropriate language, and expectations of the child or young person. These could include:
Carers’ role in helping children and young people to learn how to use the internet safely is extremely important and they must ask for support and/or further training if they lack confidence in this area. This forms part of the workforce development induction programme and recommended training for all residential staff.
If carers have any concerns about children’s online activities they should report these to the child’s social worker.
Computers with internet access should be located in a publicly accessible areas.
Carers and social workers need to be aware that most social networking sites impose age limits on their membership. Facebook, for example, currently requires members to be 13 years old or over. YouTube states that their site is not intended for under 13 year olds to view and that members must be over 18 or have parental/guardian consent to add content to the site. Young people who wish to post images of themselves on websites must be made aware of the risks involved. In some cases it may not be safe for children to post images on social networking sites such as Facebook or Twitter. This must be assessed by the child’s social worker on an individual basis.
Furthermore, young people should be warned about the risks of taking sexually explicit pictures of themselves and sharing them on the internet or by text. It is essential that young people understand the legal implications and the risks they are taking. The initial risk posed by sexting may come from peers, friends and others in their social network who may share the images. It could be shared with others or posted elsewhere online. The Criminal Justice and Courts Act (2015) introduced the offence of Revenge Porn where intimate images are shared with the intent to cause distress to the specific victim.Social networking sites are often used by perpetrators as an easy way to access children and young people for sexual abuse. The Serious Crime Act (2015) introduced an offence of sexual communication with a child. This applies to an adult who communicates with a child and the communication is sexual or if it is intended to elicit from the child a communication which is sexual and the adult reasonably believes the child to be under16 years of age. The Act also amended the Sex Offences Act 2003 so it is now an offence for an adult to arrange to meet with someone under 16 having communicated with them on just one occasion (previously it was on at least two occasions).
In addition radical and extremist groups may use social networking to attract children and young people into rigid and narrow ideologies that are intolerant of diversity: this is similar to the grooming process and exploits the same vulnerabilities. The groups concerned include those linked to extreme Islamist, or Far Right/Neo Nazi ideologies, extremist Animal Rights groups and others who justify political, religious, sexist or racist violence.
Children may be drawn to adopt a radical ideology through a failure to appreciate the bias in extremist material; in addition by repeated viewing of extreme content they may come to view it as normal.
Residential staff should attend regular Child Exploitation training via their department.
Records kept in the home on each child, including photographs, represent a significant contribution to their life history. Children will be encouraged to keep appropriate memorabilia of their time spent living at the home, including photographs.
The widespread use of mobile phones, smartphones and tablets with cameras mean that children and young people living in children’s homes will regularly take photos of themselves and others in the home. While it is not realistic to place restrictions on the taking of photos by children and young people, they should be encouraged to consider the following:
Staff must be sensitive to children who do not want to have their photograph taken.
Staff must not take photographs of children for their personal use or using their personal equipment.
This means that staff should:
There are a wide range of organisations, which offer advice, support and information on internet safety issues. Below is a short list of some of these resources.
Web sites:
| | Copyright © tri.x | |
