2. Safeguarding Children Missing from School |
Contents
AcknowledgementThe London Safeguarding Children Board thanks Jo Green (IRSC), the Metropolitan Police Missing Person's Unit and the DCSF for their contributions to this guidance. |
1. Introduction
2. Principles
| 2.1 | The principles which should be adopted by all agencies (including Local Authorities who are corporate parents), who are responsible for locating children who go missing from school, include that:
|
2.2 |
The London Child Protection Procedures |
section 4. Recognition and response and section 5. Children in specific circumstances of the London Child Protection Procedures (London Procedures) provide information which may help staff to recognise and/or manage circumstances in which children who are missing from school may be experiencing harm or be at risk of harm. These include: children subject to fabricated or induced illness or female genital mutilation; abuse by children, domestic violence, missing children and families, sexually exploited children, trafficked children and asylum seeking children. For several of these circumstances there are supplementary, detailed London multi-agency procedures, these, and the London Procedures can be accessed on the London Safeguarding Children Board's website: www.londonscb.gov.uk Research shows that children Looked After by the local authority are over-represented in the cohort of children who go missing from school. section 11. Mobile children and families of the London Procedures addresses issues relating to families moving across borough boundaries. |
3. Acting to safeguard a child who is missing from school
| Enquiries into the circumstances surrounding a child who is missing from school can be effectively supported by schools adopting an admissions procedure which requires a parent/carer to provide documentary evidence of their own and the child's identity and status in the UK, and the address that they are residing at. These checks should not become delaying factors in the admissions process. | ||
| 3.1 | Timescale |
|
Schools and other agencies will always seek to engage parents and carers as partners in ensuring that their children are safe and able to attend school. In the first four weeks that a child does not attend school, the school and other agencies, will make enquiries and assess the child's circumstances and their vulnerability by following the Process Steps at 3.3 below. In some cases the situation will be resolved between the school and the parent/carer. For other cases the timescale for initiating a multi-agency response will depend on the school's view of the vulnerability of the child. Concern for a child may be so high that a referral may be made to the police immediately the child is found to be missing. Alternatively, information may emerge over the course of time which raises the level of concern about a child's welfare and a referral should then be made to the police and LA children's social care (the LA education welfare service and/or LA nominated child protection adviser is likely to already be involved by this stage). The length of time that a child remains out of school could, of itself, be an alerting factor of risk of harm to the child. Accordingly if a situation is not resolved within four weeks, then referrals should be made to the police and LA children's social care, as appropriate. |
||
Extended leave of absence |
||
| Extended leave of absence should be authorised by the head teacher, at which point a return date is set. In these cases the time line for enquiries starts from when the child does not attend school on the expected return date, not from the day the extended leave started. | ||
3.2 |
Recording actions |
|
| Information known or received, people spoken to, decision and actions - and the reasons for taking them, should be recorded contemporaneously. If the child is subsequently reported missing to the police, or is found to be a victim of crime, full records will be required. | ||
3.3 |
Process steps |
|
| 3.3.1 | Day One |
|
The school identifies that a child is not in school. |
||
| 1. | A staff member trained to do so, telephones the child's home to seek reasons for the absence and reassurance from a parent/carer (person with Parental Responsibility for the child) that the child is safe at home. |
|
| 2. | The results of this telephone call could be that: | |
|
||
| 3. | In the case of a), b) and d) the staff member who made the telephone call should consider, with the school's nominated child protection adviser (Also known as the 'designated teacher for child protection'), the degree of vulnerability of the child; using the guidelines in 3.3.2 - Assessing a child's vulnerability: immediate response below. | |
| 4. | In the case of c) the staff member who made the telephone call should advise the parent to:
Schools will need to make arrangements for communicating with families who use English as a second language, e.g. schools may liaise with their local LA children's social care services to establish access to interpreters qualified and experienced in working with children and their families. |
|
| 3.3.2 | Assessing a child's vulnerability: immediate response |
|
| 1. | Assessing vulnerability requires a combination of professional knowledge and experience of child welfare issues and knowledge of local circumstances. Considering the following questions could assist the process. If in doubt a practitioner should always consult with managers. | |
| 2. | If the answer to any of the following questions is yes, the police should be informed, as well as, the LA children's social care services, the LA education welfare service and/or LA nominated child protection adviser: | |
See Paragraph 3.3.3 - Police Contact and Response below |
||
|
||
3. |
If the answer to any of the following questions is yes, the LA children's social care, and the LA education welfare service and/or LA nominated child protection adviser should be informed: |
|
|
||
|
||
4. |
The answers to further questions could assist a judgement whether or not to inform LA children's social care and the police: |
|
| 1. | In which age range is the child? - younger children are more at risk. | |
| 2. | Is this very sudden and unexpected behaviour? | |
| 3. | Have there been any past concerns about the child associating with significantly older young people or adults? | |
| 4. | Was there any significant incident prior to the child's unexplained absence? | |
| 5. | Has the child been a victim of bullying? | |
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. | Has the child gone missing with their family? | |
| 8. | Are there religious or cultural reasons to believe that the child is at risk? e.g. | |
|
||
| 9. | Have there been past concerns about this child and family which together with the sudden disappearance are worrying? e.g.
|
|
| 10. | Has there been any change in the child/family's financial circumstances? | |
| 11. | Has the child special educational needs? | |
5. |
If the answer to any of these further questions is yes, the LA children's social care, the LA education welfare service and/or LA nominated child protection person should be informed, and reporting to the police should be considered. |
|
| 6. | If the school can obtain no information about the child or family on Day One, and there is reason to believe that the child is at risk of harm, the LA children's social care, the LA education welfare service and/or LA nominated child protection person should be informed, and reporting to the Police should be considered. | |
| 7. | If the judgement reached on Day One is that there is no reason to believe that the child is at risk of harm, then the school may well delay further action. See Appendix 1: Extracts from the DfES Good Practice Guide: 'Identifying and Maintaining Contact with Children Missing or at Risk of Going Missing from Education' LEA/0225/2004; providing additional information which practitioners may find helpful. |
|
| 3.3.3 | Police contact and response |
|
| 1. | Step one:
|
|
| 2. | Step two:
|
|
| 3. | Step three:
|
|
| 3.3.4 | Reasonable enquiry |
|
|
||
| 3.3.5 | Days two to twenty-eight |
|
|
||
| 3.3.6 | Child missing from school for more than four weeks |
|
|
||
Appendix 1 - Extracts from DfES Good Practice Guide
Extracts from Good Practice Guide LEA/0225/200, DfES: Identifying and Maintaining Contact with Children Missing or At Risk of Going Missing from Education
Process Steps
Identify child at risk of going missing from education
There is general agreement that some children who have experienced certain life events are more at risk of going missing from education.
These include:
- Young people who have committed offences
- Children living in women's refuges
- Children of homeless families perhaps living in temporary accommodation, house of multiple occupancy or bed and breakfast
- Young runaways
- Children with long term medical or emotional problems
- Unaccompanied asylum seekers and refugees or children of asylum seeking families
- Looked after children
- Children with a gypsy/traveller background
- Young carers
- Children from transient families
- Teenage mothers
- Children who are permanently excluded from school
'What to do if you're worried a Child Is Being Abused' (DfES, 2003) contains guidance on what actions an individual should take to safeguard a child about whom there are concerns.
Looked After Children
All schools will have a designated teacher for Looked After children. These teachers are ideally placed to assist when identifying those looked after children currently in school who may be at greater risk of going missing from education.
If a Looked After Child goes missing from their care placement, the relevant local authority Children's Social Services Department will follow the guidance set out in 'Children Missing from Care and Home - A Guide to Good Practice' (DfES, 2002). This requires them to liaise with the Police in the area from where the child went missing to agree the strategy for finding the child and providing them with any necessary support.
Children with formal Child Protection Plans (used to be defined as being on the Child Protection Register)
The local authority Children's Social Services has responsibility for children with formal Child Protection Plans (used to be defined as being on the Child Protection Register). If a child one of these children goes missing, the relevant Children's Social Services Department will take steps to locate the child. This may involve contacting Child Protection Managers in other local authorities.
Children in Need
Where a child has been assessed by the local authority Children's Social Services as being 'in need' and their family is working with Children's Social Services, Children's Social Services will liaise with the Police in the area from where the child went missing to agree the strategy for finding the child and providing them with any necessary support.
Appendix 2 - Local Authority Social Services Letter LASSL (2005)3
Click here to view Local Authority Social Services Letter LASSL (2005)3
Appendix 3 - Information Sharing Between Schools and LA Children's Social Care
Click here to view Appendix 3 - Information Sharing Between Schools and La Children's Social Care
End




