Caption: table about Following Immediate Action to Protect a Child
|
|
3.1 |
If, following a Section 47 Enquiry, it is necessary to take immediate action to protect the child (i.e. Emergency Protection Order, child accommodated by agreement or placed elsewhere), consider convening an initial Child Protection Conference and consider what action, if any, should be taken to ensure the child’s continued safety. |
3.2 |
If the conference recommends Care Proceedings should be instigated and that an Interim Care Order should be sought to prevent the child returning to the care of his/her parents (or the person from whose care the child was removed in order to protect his/her safety and welfare), a Child Protection Plan may not be needed for the child, if the child’s safety is already secured with alternative carers. |
3.3 |
In these circumstances the conference must make a clear recommendation that if, at any time during the course of the Care Proceedings, the child returns to the care of his/her parents or carers about whom there are concerns, a further conference must be convened immediately, regardless of whether the care proceedings are to continue. |
3.4 |
This will be necessary in the following circumstances:
- An application for an interim or full order is refused;
- The child is placed with parents / carers in an assessment setting and there are concerns that the child remains at risk of further Significant Harm;
- The child remains placed at home whilst care proceedings continue;
- Any other situation where the child returns to the care of his/her parents or carers, without the local authority’s agreement and concerns about the likelihood of further Significant Harm.
|
3.5 |
The re-convened conference will:
- Ensure that all professionals and agencies with the child and family will be fully aware of the changes to the child’s care and legal status;
- Enable multi-agency consideration of the level of any continuing risk to the child; and
- Decide if a Child Protection Plan or child and young person’s plan is appropriate to achieve the child’s continued safety and welfare.
|
Caption: section 4 text
|
|
4.1 |
In cases where a child has been subject to a Child Protection Plan for a period of time, but where the interagency Child Protection Plan has failed to achieve the required level of safety for the child, Care Proceedings may be initiated at a later stage. In these circumstances, once an order has been made which ensures the child’s safety (i.e. an interim care order); a review conference should be convened to consider whether a protection plan is still required. |
4.2 |
Prior to any conference taking place when a child is, or is likely to be, the subject of Care Proceedings, legal services should be consulted and asked for advice in respect of legal issues and protection of the child. |
4.3 |
If the protection plan is discontinued, other professionals and agencies involved with the child and family must be kept fully informed regarding the child’s care and legal status and the progress of the Care Proceedings. The ‘Children in Care(Kent) / Looked after Children (Medway)’ (LAC) procedure, which requires that regular reviews take place and clear plans are made for the child’s future care, should assist in ensuring this happens. In these circumstances the above apply (see paragraph 3.3 -3.5). |
Caption: section 6 text
|
|
6.1 |
Where a Child in Care(Kent) / Looked after Child (Medway) remains the subject of a Child Protection Plan, there should be a single planning and reviewing process, led by the IRO, leading to the development of a single plan. |
6.2 |
Consideration should be given to the IRO chairing the Child Protection Conference where a Child in Care(Kent) / Looked after Child (Medway) remains subject to a Child Protection Plan. Where that is not possible, it will be expected that the IRO will attend the Child Protection Review Conference. |
6.3 |
The timing of the Looked After Reviews should be scheduled to ensure that timescales for reviewing both the child protection and the care plan for the child meet both statutory timescales. |
6.4 |
The Looked After Review, when reviewing the child protection aspects of the plan, should consider whether the criteria continue to be met for the child to remain the subject of a Child Protection Plan. |
6.5 |
Consideration must be given to ensuring that the multi-agency contribution to the review of the Child Protection Plan is addressed within the review of the Care Plan. |
6.6 |
When a child is subject to a Child Protection Plan and is removed from accommodation by parents or child is returned to parents or carers in court proceedings, against the recommendation of the local authority, a review child protection conference must be convened to consider the risks to the child and the implications for the protection plan. |
6.7 |
If necessary the local authority must take action to protect a child prior to a conference. This must not be delayed until a child protection review is convened if an enquiry or assessment indicates it is required sooner. |